Yes and anyone else wanting a TLDR. Listen from about 40 minutes to exactly 46 minutes and 10 seconds, it's at this point fictitious capitals whole argument unravels.
Something along the lines of trusted third parties need to be uncorruptible. Alex laughs, this is when you realise.
I thought fictitious was a credible well researched and articulate person. His challenges were good but I didn’t hear any solutions and a lot of reasoning was based on evidence from history which I think ignores that Bitcoin is a new discovery that can provide alternate paths and can’t be accounted for by prior monies.
I did like him, a different kind of Bitcoiner, kind of a bear sceptic but on the same team
I listened hard and honest to God it felt like word salad at times.
I hope that doesn't mean I'm so biased all I can hear are the people I like.
Nonetheless, I'd like to get alex in the ring with larger detractors.
