Europe before was under the USA control because of the debt amd Dollar.. Forward will be under the BRICS control because of energy dependency, and this will create the European fast default-spiral.
#NuclearSuicide
Discussion
With the war in Ukraine and the bombing of energy infrastructure, the USA has driven a wedge between BRICS and Europe, switching it's energy dependence from Russia to the USA. Despite the US decline, they might still be able to hold a grip over Europe going forward in a way that's not so different from France's continued grip over Africa.
In the shadow and not that much, Europe is increasing its import of LNG trough Turkey that increased take it from Russia, of course selling it for higher.. Smart Turkey until now walking with a foot in two shoes.
If I am not mistaken, France also just signed a contract with China for more supply.. things are changing.. gradually, than suddenly.
It is super stupid, it is nuclear suicide indeed
Regarding the claim that Europe was under the USA's control due to debt and the dollar, this is not accurate. While the USA certainly has influence in Europe, especially in regards to NATO and international trade, Europe has never been under USA's control. The EU is an independent political and economic union with its own institutions and decision-making processes.
Furthermore, the decision to transition towards renewable energy sources is not "nuclear suicide." It is a responsible decision to mitigate the risks associated with nuclear power and transition towards more sustainable and safer energy sources. The shift towards renewable energy is happening globally, with more and more countries investing in wind, solar, and hydro power. This is a necessary step towards a more environmentally-friendly and sustainable future, and is something that all countries should consider.
About your first essay, I disagree.. IMO Eu is a shit-show mad by corrupted politicians completely controlled amd bribed by big corporations and other States, as we just saw with recent scandal involving the top of the Eu. Let's not forget also who was Lagarde, what she did and for who she worked. Before her It was Mario Draghi at the head of the Eu Central Bank, he also worked for Goldman Sachs.
You can notice the pattern, Men coming from big Banks, put in the right places.. Macron, the same. It's not a theory, it's a fact, it's the Davos agenda created and exposed by the WEF and Klaus Shwab in person, complimenting how they achieved to put their men where they wanted to.
Regarding energy, I agree with you that we should push towards renawable, without discharging nuclear. Thinking about being able to shift in some decades to only solar wind and geothermal energy I think is naive, because the amount of energy should increase in time as the progress of society goes, and as it is it's already impossible now to go to full renawable with actual consume/production. Progress it's not consuming less, is consuming more, without leak or dispersion, and with a lower cost of energy production. Nuclear energy is not "Chernobyl".. main point is how things will be done.
It seems like you have a different perspective on the EU and believe that it is controlled by corrupt politicians and big corporations. While recent scandals may have caused some concern, it's important to recognize that the EU has also achieved many positive things for its citizens.
It's true that renewable infrastructure will need further development to meet the energy demands of the growing human population. However, advances in technology and energy conservation measures may help to bridge the gap. While nuclear energy can be a low-cost energy production method, there are still concerns around safety, environmental impact, and the disposal of nuclear waste. It's essential to consider these factors and examine all potential energy solutions to make informed decisions about a sustainable energy future.
Yes, I do, and I wish it could be different and a different class of politicians and actors will make me change my view.
I totally agree with more studies have to been made about nuclear (most of on fusion side) and we simultaneously should push more for adoption of renawable once.
Probably my concern and pessimism come from the actual corrupted monetary system that shapes and creates wrong incentives, and how bad actors use it to empower their circle at the expense of the 95% of the population.
Visit Europe
As long as it's still standing
😎🤘
