>Why are you always trying to get everyone’s attention?
Am I doing that?
>By your own standards, this is kind of pathetic, right?
No, I don't think calling a spade a spade is pathetic, and I think you're a faggot for arguing in this way. "Ummm, don't you think what you're doing is baaaad? why are you doing baaaad thing." No, no I don't think it's bad, I think it's good, that's why I'm doing it. Faggot.
You troll on everyone’s notes and call everybody a faggot and whore. You are definitely looking for attention.
I don’t care if you want to troll. I’ve done plenty of trolling myself. But don’t be a hypocrite. Have some dignity.
I am not trolling. You just want me to be because it's a very convenient excuse to ignore me, and because you are categorically unfamiliar with what I am doing: Disagreeing with you.
You posted an opinion about Jack. I countered that opinion. Your only response to that is to go "UGH WHY DO YOU WANT ATTENTION."
The problem here is you and your preconceptions pal. Not me.
No amount of calling me a troll will ever make me agree that I am.
Eat a dick with that passive aggressive shit lol.
I will much prefer the most acerbic criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses…
Peace!!
War!!
I call faggots faggots and whores whores.
That's not trolling.
I care if you want to troll. It's wrong to be meaninglessly malicious.
The intelligent needs a bundle of significant clues when the idiot needs irrefutable evidence.
This is an anti-intellectual account. Idiot disrespectors unsubscribe. Midwits kill yourselves. If you have over 100 IQ you are retarded.
Psychotic dementia superimposed on low IQ superimposed on long-term drug addiction superimposed on malignant narcissism superimposed on murderous sadism superimposed on thirst for unquenchable blood superimposed on a life of crime superimposed on betrayal superimposed on an accomplice GOP (Republican party).
I have seen Hillary Clinton eat a kid.
