Nostr Web Client

I am serious that you don't define your terms. I love my gay sister, brother-in-law and niece very much, but I also believe marriage is a sacrament of the church to which they willingly don't belong.

Just because I don't want military age men flooding the Texas border where my family lives doesn't mean I'm a racist.

I would suggest by not being specific about what you mean, you're not serious about conversation.

The question I posed in the above note is a real one that gets to the heart of what it means to be a racist. Is it defined in terms of some generalized hegemonic oppression, a particular agenda, or does the word actually mean something?

Ava 1y ago

Your statement perfectly illustrates why I block certain content. Claiming to 'love' your LGBTQ+ family while declaring they 'don't belong' because of their sexual orientation or gender identity is textbook bigotry.

Dehumanizing rhetoric about 'military age men flooding the border' instead of seeing people seeking safety only reinforces this pattern of prejudice based on nationality and ethnicity.

No amount of religious justification or deflection changes this fact: judging people's right to belong based on their fundamental human identity is bigotry. Full stop.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

William ₿ Travis 1y ago

Where does this fundamental human dignity derive?

Ava 1y ago

From the same source you invoke to exclude others. If you believe in divine creation, then you must accept that all humans are created with inherent dignity - not just those who match your interpretation of belonging.

Every major faith tradition teaches this fundamental truth: human dignity is innate, not earned or granted by human judgment.

Your selective application of divine love contradicts its universal nature.

William ₿ Travis 1y ago

You didn't answer the question. Where does human dignity derive? Innateness isn't something you can prove. It's just an assertion.

Vikingarna1990 1y ago

Invoking "inherent dignity" is a euphemism for maximizing parasitism.

Where is the dignity in sucking the blood and energy out of selected plebs to feed other plebs?

The major faith traditions are wrong. There is no "inherent human dignity."

Vikingarna1990 1y ago

Ava's parasitical Marxism shines through.

Marxism is the most dehumanizing idea ever hatched by Homo sapiens.

Accordingly, Marxism came straight from the Jew.

Ava wants to engage in forced parasitism through the Marxist state. Of course, she is an internationalist. She supports international parasitism.

Blood and energy are to be drained from selected productive plebs and funneled to other plebs.

Ava is a genuine psychopathic parasite.

What Ava doesn't realize, however, is that she will only be a junior partner in the vanguard party.

The Jew always rises to the top in its own system.

Fabiano 1y ago

Ava is literally expressing a logical fallacy.

It is not the first or only one.

Saying we, as humans, already put in action our best qualities and choices. As if we make no mistakes (the very existence of logical fallacies prove we make a lot of those).

We miss the target. That err is "pecare" in Latin. That is sin.

We are called to convert.

We step away from God's Glory.

The way to live up to His Love for us, thus our dignity, is by abnegation.

Not by embracing our sinful habits.

Go and sin no more.

Excerpt:

"We Can’t Escape

Sin is a constant of the human condition. It’s all around us. It’s inside us, too. We are all sinners. Sometimes our sins are large, like adultery or murder. Sometimes they are as small as a harsh word or a cutting glance. But they’re always there. We sense that things shouldn’t be this way, that there must have been a time when things were right in the world. And there was such a time."

https://www.catholic.com/tract/gods-love-for-you