*not* changing code is an attack vector now?
You make too many assumptions about those who oppose your ideas.
*not* changing code is an attack vector now?
You make too many assumptions about those who oppose your ideas.
You make too many assumptions about my assumptions 😂
If you don't get it, you're free to consider me a dumb guy rambling.
I do however think you should checkout the other comments on this thread to know when not updating can be an attack vector... But you're free to assume something and ignore it.
You just provided another vapid response. Nothing in your thread contains anything meaningful. It's quite concerning seeing someone make victory laps in an empty stadium, I only address it in case someone mistook it as valid. I don't consider you dumb. Perhaps overstating your abilities, but nobody is incapable of learning something they put the appropriate time toward.
Yeah yeah, stupid invalid thread, everybody gets your eyeballs away from here please!
I don't know why you ended up in my timeline, but the fact that you did is enough reason to respond. You must be having the time of your life getting all this attention.
Did I like steal your Bitcoin or something? I'm sorry for causing whatever malfunction I caused in your brain.
Your attempt to shut down debate by accusing dissenters of being subjects of a social attack is the real attack on speech. It is distracting from the issue at hand, which is whether node runners should be tricked into conveying nonfinancial data to the miners.