A valid critique and why a “firewall” between donors (any) and developers/projects is so important for both groups
HRF, Brink and OpenSats all provide this mechanism and a deeply knowledgeable group of committed Bitcoiners to assess relative grant application merits
An utterly thankless task but so important to reduce the risk of development capture 🤝
The question is what happens when 2-3 generations pass? How do we ensure that the torch gets passed down to generations of people that will live in a bitcoin world and take such things for granted?
That question is broader and encompasses nurturing the flames that gave rise to the birth of Bitcoin in the first place - awareness of the issue is the first part, and teaching and educating about those key aspects follows closely behind
Apathy is the greatest risk to Bitcoin
That question is broader and encompasses nurturing the flames that gave rise to the birth of Bitcoin in the first place - awareness of the issue is the first part, and teaching and educating about those key aspects follows closely behind
Apathy is the greatest risk to Bitcoin
That question is broader and encompasses nurturing the flames that gave rise to the birth of Bitcoin in the first place - awareness of the issue is the first part, and teaching and educating about those key aspects follows closely behind
Apathy is the greatest risk to Bitcoin
