#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=715x1076&blurhash=%5EADI%2Cd%3FG%5EQE2%25g9Z%7EBnBn-x%5Dtkj%3F0L%2B%7DNGr%3FIo%2520%7BEwNZMxwIs%3A00EfMws%3BMwNxMLM%7CRjkUWBkDpJJ%25k%3DWT%25Ms%2B%25gxvtSWrWDxF%25go%23XnNaM%7CV%40&x=644679a5587c9690b2f8045acf6b6e5c06a332071732588a03a374674f4e0575

Nikon D90 + AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II @ f/5.6 1/80s IS0-250 32mm. Developed in RawTherapee. Two significant settings changed in RawTherapee - 1) changed the processing profile to "Standard Film Curve - ISO low" and 2) used the Film Simulation* Agfa Vista 200.

* It's not. It's unlike film in this case. If I wanted it to look like actual Agfa Vista I'd reduce the saturation by about 1/3rd, turn off all sharpening, apply a touch of fine luminance noise, possibly applying a very slight gaussian blur after and decreasing the white balance colour temperature by about 1/4th. Maybe reduce the resolution to about 5mp. Other films are closer to digital, now digital has caught up, so less mucking about required for Kodak Portra/Fuji Astia & other peak film films. I use film colour emulation because it's less posterioring about than posterioring around with colour curves. Same reason film was/is good. Anyway checkout the RawTherapee wiki about film simulation to replicate or, relatively easily, do it better. The B&W film profiles are good.