Most retarded take:
Some people have 200k followers, while others can barely get 200, because the former engages more with other Nostriches.
You are trying to make connections between numbers that have no direct relationship.
Most retarded take:
Some people have 200k followers, while others can barely get 200, because the former engages more with other Nostriches.
You are trying to make connections between numbers that have no direct relationship.
Idk how i got to the amount I have. My only guess is consistent posting and interaction.
And my follows have been nuked twice. Still trying to follow who I followed back.
It was consistent content imho... However I've always believed less is more (focus on quality)... You do you though
That tactic would work better on a content-focused app like #Alexandria, but worse on a timeline.
Timelines are about being immediate, novel, and frequent.
Yo nostr:npub16secklpnqey3el04fy2drfftsz5k26zlwdsnz84wtul2luwj8fdsugjdxk, I re-read this note today and wanted to clarify that I don't think you post non-quality posts. The reason for your followers is because your consistent and regular with your quality post. It was a more a message to mass memers who flood timelines with notes (where 1/30 notes will actually be good)
Never expect someone to admit to having some asymmetric advantage when maintaining their position depends upon denying it.
Always expect that person to fight and protest against any attempt to remove that advantage and level the playing field.
I have no advantage!
And don't you dare take it away!
The influencers interact with each other. Others wanting the same thing they can up their numbers by hopping on that train.
I’m regularly offending most reading my posts. Its a strategy working for me for a circle of strong minded and strategic independent thinkers.
Same. 😂
I also am not afraid of competing at a harder game. I am a never-ending found of interesting and engaging content. Bring it.
It is not true for a few reasons too. It also seems to suggest that any old engagement is good/will do, when some people want more meaningful engagement or topic-focused discussion and back and forth.
The user looking for topic-focused engagement/discussions isn't still not going to really find it, because there's hardly any subcultures/topics on nostr.
The same with these people finding topics. 'they should just follow more people' isn't going to help, because those conversations are just not here in abundance. Eg an angling enthusiast is probably not going to *just* want a load of likes and some GMs.
Again, with a lot of Nostr, it seems like a perspective of people have come from bitcointwitter and want bitcointwitter and are content with nostr as it is because it is (mostly) bitcointwitter2.
'he should've just replied GM more' doesn't really help these Other People tho lol.
Speaking of which, I wonder where that angling guy is actually lol.
The fact that it really sticks in my memory that there was This One Guy Who Was Really Into Angling, probably is a bad sign.
Yeah, I try to engage with people about all sorts of topics, but only a few catch on. Simply no market for the other stuff.
I engage a lot and acknowledge I may have a low follower count simply because I have shit takes. 🤷♂️
Here's how you get followers:
Be famous.
Be rich.
Be female.
Have friends who are famous, rich, and/or female, and boost your stuff.
Pay people directly.
Be one of the first people here.
Be unusually interesting or informative.
Some combination thereof.
The best is when dull women lecture men to "post more interesting, engaging content".
Imagine spending your entire life being so cute that you don't even notice how boring you are.
The "Self Made", "Hard Worker" fallacy.
While it is certain that you'll get nowhere without putting in the work. People often forget to account for the luck of circumstances and serendipity. You can work incredibly hard and get nowhere if you don't know the right people and have no sense of timing. 🤷🏻♂️
Or if you simply don't have the talent. Some people engage avidly, but nobody follows them because it's sort of incoherent or whatnot.
True … but it is not just about the follows is about the interaction
Well, yeah.
Of course, I'm biased because I think follows are obsolete legacy tech and should just be put out of their misery. 😂
Indeed, I guess I was being more general/abstract. But you're absolutely correct of the nostr engagement 🤗
Nostr is the only place until now where I have the feeling that this shit does not matter. I can engage (or not) with everyone and don’t see the same influencers all the time 💜
Same, but I've had to think through how to choose my client and configure my relays, and that is apparently beyond many people.
Clients are going to have to pre-chew a lot more, but avoid just showing everyone the same stuff or hard-coding everything.
Yes!!!! My Amethyst and primal are so different i don't even know what is the issue. The relay part is hard to understand. My long form content cannot be seen in primal by me in the article page, followers are not seen in primal.
I am new here so it's valuable insights I suppose, make shit easy folks. I don't want want to write and make let people see it. Smh it's complex. Helpppp 😂😂
Also I don't even know if this post will reach you. I cannot see it in primal for eg. Maybe it takes time?
I have the weirdest npub of all, as it's not that big, follower-wise, and it rarely gets quoted or boosted, it's not on any lists (except naughty lists), and it's been muted by lots of popular people, but it still regularly trends.
My content is much more popular than I am. I guess that makes me the opposite of whatever an influencer is. 😁