Might seem unrealistic now but I think crowdfunding for large, ambitious projects from stakeholders that benefit directly from the product could replace VC.

Projects could crowdfund from institutions or HNWI directly eg sovereign wealth funds funding a local energy grid infrastructure or MIT endowment funding a rocket for student space programs. There's more alignment of outcomes and incentives there.

Why do we need the VC middlemaning the process and gatekeeping capital? Why do we need a handful of "experts with pattern recognition" to fund things they probably don't even use? Why do they need to take 2/20 on innovation when that capital could be used to invest in builders? Wtf are they building, their net worth?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.