Replying to Avatar Leo Wandersleb

You asked for relays to share their TOS but:

> - You are solely responsible for checking for any updates to this ToS regularly.

> - By continuing to use the relay after a ToS change, you automatically agree to the new ToS.

looks a bit unbalanced. Imagine the worst TOS out there. This TOS can turn into that tomorrow and you agree to it by just opening your nostr client?
Avatar
Vitor Pamplona 9mo ago

As long as they commit to something, people can react to it. If they never commit to anything, we are screwed.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Leo Wandersleb 9mo ago

But that's my point! What do you gain from them committing to not leak your naughty queries when it's just a hollow promise? So the boss tells the intern to put up this new TOS.html but intern gets inspired and taps the logs for juicy data.

Avatar
Leo Wandersleb 9mo ago

To prevent this, we need to come up with other, privacy preserving protocols.

Filtering should happen more in the periphery. So my PC should get my events 24/7 and my nostr client should query my PC.

Querying relays should not be linked to npubs. Protocols that require ID to query ar hostile to privacy even though they are portrait as the opposite. "Only you can find your nip4 DMs". The more private way is gift wraps or other such protocols. Gift wraps incur a burden on the infrastructure so storage and delivery of these events has to be paid in a private way, using nuts for example.