Replying to Avatar StackSats.IO

Fuller outlines an alternate history in Critical Path that will be very appealing to anyone who enjoys conspiracy theories or alternate histories.

Bitcoiners will get a kick out of his views on history in general and the history of money in particular.

Whether hes completely right or not, the fact he focussed on this topic shows he understood how important money as a technology was to humanity.

Early on in this book, for me as someone who hadn’t been exposed to Fuller’s ideas other than some supposed quotes, he seems like a bit of a pinko.

But then he takes a road somewhere between the Austrian school and Nick Szabo when discussing the development of money and credit, discussing:

1) how the Phoenecians circumnavigated and mapped the world two millenia before we think it happened

2) a ramble on how we later shifted from cattle to metals as the dominant money but how it was primarily used as collateral rather than MoE

3) how based on ship building and associated technology evolutions how he thinks humans evolved and spread out of Austronesian peoples from SE Asia

The first third of this book is the kind of thing you would have heard on the Joe Rogan Experience 10 years ago before he went mainstream when he was still super interested in fringe ideas.

Again, I’ve got rabbitholes to dive here so am not claiming hes right on everything, but the fact he points to Thailand as the historical source of modern man rather than Africa, and the fact Thailand was one of the few countries never colonised is something I found really interesting - nobody today would dare challenge the consensus of the origins of humanity but Bucky just goes for it and explains why and even if he’s wrong it’s worth considering how he arrived at his positions.

nostr:note1zx050vhq9cxxzz5a8583redeqhl42afkv666jwldnfe2gukf5skqcjrmdc

He speculated so freely and his reasoning was based in his own framework, that’s for sure, and that model was ahead of its time. He wasn’t perfect by any means, but he gives a great example of thinking for oneself.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

He makes and repeats the claim that he basically reset his life at 32 to only work on things that would benefit all of humanity.

I’m skeptical of anyone claiming such altruistic ideals but god damn his output was just way out there compared to anything else other people were doing during that time and it’s all big-picture thinking which lends a lot of credibility to his claims.

Proper interesting man who Bitcoiners ought be more familiar with. Listening to him talk about energy grids and connecting up humanity to improve all lives nearly 50 years ago is just surreal in the age of big Gov subsidising renewables.

It has been a long time since I read in this book. I’m going to pick it up again. His articulation of Design Science was inspirational to me.

If you re-read it, please do a review on #bookstr and tag me in. I would be extremely interested to hear someone who read this both pre and post orangepilling.

Sure thing, it will take me awhile but I’ll get there.