It doesn’t feel engineered at all. This has been an ongoing discussion for some time. Satoshi thought about it way back then too. I’m tired of everything being seen as an attack just because one doesn’t approve it. It’s an open source ecosystem and if an app changes units that’s fine - it’s their choice. The market will decide. I don’t see anything wrong with experimenting with this. In fact, I plan on doing just so with my own projects.

I don’t think any of the issues you are concerned about have as grave of consequences as you feel they do. But, I respect your opinion and remain cautiously in the don’t touch the thing that works camp for now. I fully agree it’ll be confusing. When we made Banco Libre we had bitcoin as the unit instead of sats (not by design) and that was confusing to me. But I have to be aware that people like me are few in the grand scheme of things and I’d rather get feedback from normies and not rely on my personal opinion and what I’m accustomed to already.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’ll be honest—I don’t understand why you’d want to experiment with something you already admit will be confusing. At a time when the window for everyday people to access Bitcoin is rapidly closing, the last thing we need is more confusion.

And as for whether it’s engineered or not—I’ve been on social media long enough to recognize how viral agendas are seeded and amplified. Before Jack Dorsey picked this up, it was just another fringe idea from John Carvalho. Now it’s suddenly everywhere. That’s not organic. That’s coordinated momentum.

It’s distraction. And it comes at the worst possible time.

Let's leave it at that.

I thought I made it clear already - people who would find it confusing are few, and people who might benefit are many.

Might benefit. I don’t know if they will.

Ultimately bitcoin requires several run ins to start getting it and learning about sats is not a huge barrier imo.