For all those people who want to say something dumb (while thinking you're clever) like "you keep changing the numbers":
My early work on this topic evolved significantly from its initial stages, and I've gained valuable insights from the community along the way.
When I started, I didn’t have access to this level of information. Only through the community’s support was I able to enhance the analysis to reflect a more accurate mathematical correlation, making it far more comprehensive.
Below is an example of the analysis that was not known in the early stages of my research into this field.
To those who want to be stuck in the past with old numbers, why would you not want to improve? That would help no one.
