Following your logic up to version 25 of Core, we all did censorship. For nearly 14 years our nodes “censored” the same kind of spam that today is referred as “inscriptions”. Only in 2023 this suddenly became “censorship” when Core devs silently redefined the purpose of the datacareier filter so they don’t have to fix it, and practically erase a new “industry” that was created around an exploit of the code. I suspect at this point they were paid or coerced to do it. The damage that has been done to the protocol as a result is evident from the post here. 98% spam txs vs only 2% monetary txs. They basically turned Bitcoin in a crappier version of Ethereum.
Discussion
Lol. And running knots changes what?
It brings us back to the roots of being a monetary network, not a shitcoin casino.
most definitely not.
If you say so
the only thing that could bring us back to the ideological "roots" if somehow we got rid of all the luddites and custody apologists. most of whom are big fans of knots.
> all the luddites and custody apologists. most of whom are big fans of knots.
Not my experience.
maybe you should poll your knots friends on any scalability related soft fork proposal and check the results.
Reducing spam on chain is one way to scale bitcoin and the pictures above show that pretty well.
This wouldn't be a problem if all those knots retards would just use bitcoin as p2p electronic cash and start transacting and stop ideology larping.
the filter was always wrong in the first place. it was always able to be bypassed. every consensus valid transaction should get confirmed. if you hate inscriptions so much, make them invalid in consensus.
