Replying to Avatar Lau

It is not a resignation. I see no comparison between so-called US bravery and whatever men in the EU are doing, it is more nuanced and conditions are different. There is no vote for a federal EU leadership. US citizens all speak the same language and adhere to the same culture, most have little perspective of what happens outside their borders, yet they unite on single issues easily. EU citizens are divided, but not without resistance. The problem for both is their cognitive bias. If you don’t know what the problem is, you don’t know the solution (as is so evident in this ignorant WEF speaker). Your problem is that people and politicians alike don’t know the problem, you are bravely addressing this and I admire you for this.

This WEF man speaks of technology he does not understand, and of constructs of state he has studied so poorly. A law, a policy, a legislation, is only as functional as its enforcement. This digital identity he speaks of may become law, but the policy has no foothold in other jurisdictions, and the internet is without jurisdiction. They can play their game of whack a mole, but the budget for it will dwindle with the result brought forth from their encroachment of natural liberties that can’t be taken. I notice even our freedom fighters haven’t learned much from Solchenizhin. The freedom of the mind can’t be taken. So will our ability to resist encroachment of freedom remain and the enforceability of their policies are only as strong as the hypocrisy of their actions. Burning books didn’t work, so will it be for censoring notes. Ideas are stored in our minds, not on a screen. They can spread in any way we deem fit, and the best ideas will sound useful to most.

I am here spreading my ideas with tons of others, I will be here in this virtual space that knows no jurisdiction. I will write my notes. No digital ID or any other policy is going to change that. I have offered you my help three times. My skill is not organization, my skill is rhetoric. If you need me to help you I will help you, but you will need to organize.

In a time of the war against privacy just rhetoric doesn’t work.

You mentioned a lot of explanations why don’t act and expect from me to organize, while don’t see your direct participation.

Non of country can be free if its citizens don’t do efforts. The US has rights and freedoms because there are men who don’t explain why it is impossible, but doing impossible things possible.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The war against privacy is a futile fight, because it can't be enforced. My voice knows no platform so it can't be de-platformed. This is my direct participation, my notes can be discovered and read.

People aren't bound by borders anymore. This is the error I see many make, including the brave Americans. They are fighting not just for themselves but for everyone everywhere. Your fight is not bound by your jurisdiction, your fight is a broadcast on protocols.

I think you're making statements but you don't know whether they are true. Saying rhetoric doesn't work is your assumption, you don't know. Same goes for saying no country can be free of their citizens don't do work. You don't know what citizens are doing. You can't because you don't see every individual.

I think it's important to realize your own biased view of things, and stop ideologically filling in what you want or think as though it is true as a statement.

Of course, everything is biased. But there is a solution: proof of work. If it doesn’t work, it means there is a problem. Just face it.

Work takes time. Not all work is physical. Problems exist and resolve all the time. I see progress, conditions leading to emergence. Bitcoin is a manifestation that would not exist if the conditions didn't accumulate to its existence, just like a bird lays an egg. Not all problems require you to peck your egg in stead of letting it hatch by itself. Not saying you shouldn't do anything or nothing at all, but to distinguish what is useful work and what isn't.

The most important is to be honest to yourself. Don’t explain if you don’t see the need. It is not my point to judge you or anyone else.

To move things forward we need to be honest to ourselves. Things are going not in correct direction in the EU. No proof of work, no sense in proof of talk.

We need to be open minded and see what instruments and what resources we have to fix it. Before it is too late.

Like I said, I'm at your disposal.

Open mindedness and blunt honesty are required for those who mean to be meaningful.

The assessment that things are not going in the correct way in the EU is only correct ethically. To have a result of change we must have critical mass. The EU is working very hard to oppress people, which I think will contribute to people starting to economize their choices differently than they have done. In the US people think Trump is saving them, which is weakening their resistance to early. Momentum is lost and trust is won back by centralized government, with potentially disastrous outcome.

Yes those that see must act, but each has their own contribution. Mine is explanation.