Just an fyi to the person who created "n/cannabis", "n/weed", AND "n/420" šŸ˜‚ . . . nostr communities are namespaced to the pubkey of the founder, which means there is no scarcity of names. It's not like reddit where the first person who registers a name is the only one who gets to use it!

nostr:npub15wyty5cssz4ezu3hpnkt05d4v2vnvlllq2xcpfgp7rtcf3jnj05qu5rdwm

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

They were probably high when they did that.

šŸ˜‚ stoner move

A good implementation. šŸ‘šŸ¼

So wait. Then users can curate feeds between key1/n/420 and key2/n/420? Wondering about the indexing - people said Google became useless during the strike.

Pretty much, yeah. The URL scheme on Satellite is /n//

This way you can have competition and one person is not able to monopolize a valuable namespace.

I’ve been thinking a lot about indexing - it’s a very interesting open problem

Zap to nominate good discussions to main indexed namespace that no one owns and is simply generated when the first /n/420 is made? I’m not quite sure what you mean by claim - is that the moderation role? I’m not a redditor but know previous bbs systems…

Ah I’m thinking about ā€œindexingā€ generally, not just for search engines - nostr in general is not very search engine accessible. The moderation role is just deciding which posts to allow in your version of the community. They’re all independent in that sense. An interesting question, I think, is what signals/metrics should be used to determine the ā€œdefaultā€ version if a community. Like how do you quantify ā€œgood moderationā€? Zaps are certainly one such signal

Yeah. Zaps are cool. Really shows commitment like community notes do.

Is it possible to measure views in Nostr tho to ā€œkeep it plebā€?