How has the science for my condition redacted?

First, realize it's an iatrogenic condition, that means caused by treatment. Then realize the eventual outcome is what I'm going through. Plus, it changes physiology in some good ways short-term. So, I'm guessing "they" didn't want people to know about the treatment.

Well, conveniently, the iatrogenic condition doesn't show up on tests due to its novelty. So, who's to know who has it anyway?

The writer of the original article commented that the condition was being reclassified under acute polyendocrine auto-immune with candidiasis, since it shared so many similar features in the end. However, the pathology is wholly different and the science is known, documented, and fascinating. It was a lengthy writeup and the author likely had first-hand experienced, which would mean more modern experiments which would likely be accounted for by what the author said in another part where they said the treatment had been considered for the super soldier program during the Cold War.

Once it was reclassified, no one needed to know from where the old type originated.