Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar arfonzo

I'm not just a fan of changing something unless it's broke. I have nothing against rust, per se.

But changing the core utils from very known, very old, highly battle tested and maintained code to rust utils, without proper testing (already there are many critical bugs reported), just isn't something I can agree with--particularly when we're talking about core utils.

Also the original core utils maintainers are skilled in C/C++. Now to say they need to learn rust to maintain the same toolset, is not exactly fair IMHO.

Avatar
Tony Acid 2w ago

got you! thank you.

I guess it's hard to find a balance between stability that is offered by "old", and progress that the "new" enables.

Usually "new" wins over "old" when is at least 10x better.

So, the question is: is Rust 10x better than C/C++ ?

I'm not in a position to answer this...

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.