Jim O’Gullaghan at it again
nostr:nevent1qqs2xxw7n29svag8ran6h6yur5d00pf7w6gnae9jd8uhnmel9hvkjyqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqgsy67zzq5tc9cxnl6crf52s4hptdwhyaca5j7r8jwll535tdadedvcrqsqqqqqpjdd0dr
Please Login to reply.
The phrase “linked to potential crimes” is doing some heavy lifting in that document. So invade privacy first and ask for the evidence of crimes later?
Reads like standard operating procedure in the eulag
