it is a convention to regard subjective as superior to objective.

but subjective captures data local to the observer where objective misses all this.

the real reason why subjective is considered inferior is because of liars and people with delusional brainwashing and psychosis.

i guarantee if you can get honest subjective reports in mass you get much more useful data than averaged out "objective" data.

part of the reason is that this averaging process that leads us to "objective" data is ... yes... subjective! and those who get paid to do it their bosses usually have agendas, and are essentially psychotic.