Replying to Avatar Laeserin

This is something different. I have no idea how nostr:npub1nf9vm6uhs4j7yaysmjn9eqlf7et5t6hvrkdqgpd995vcc9yfjyas0pxa3x proposal ended up in the issue.

He then added a proposal that loaded correctly, so I initially didn't see this note.

I am still new-ish to git, so maybe I did something out of order.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

that shouldn't be possible

Can you explain what the problem is?

I can see:

1) the proposal with a merged status. The is the rootiof this discussion thread.

2) the following issue that references the proposal: nostr:nevent1qqstsczw4lxjdtwnysemzg8sjl3ythhf7va2h63lrwt4lkdu8m9kvcgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsd6ejdteqpvse63ntf7qz6u9yqspp4z7ymt8094urzwm0x2ceaxxgrqsqqqpj4lmcdjx

These are displaying as expected for me on gitworkshop.dev

I guess I'm confused by this. I only see one proposal in my repo.

What am I looking at, here.

I thought I had one issue and one proposal from James, but here are two proposals.

I'm confused.

I see whst you mean now. I wasn't looking at the recent proposals section on the homepage.

What you are seeing is one cover letter and one commit from the same proposal but listed separately.

There are two problems uncovered here:

1) 'recent proposals' should just show the proposal root and not each each commit.

2) links to a commit (or a reply for that matter) should take you to the proposal page with the specific commit / reply highlighted.

I'll look onto this next week.

Ah, I see! I was like Wut?

Thanks for reporting and clarifying.