Yep, more surveillance and more state sponsored violence.
But they broke the law you say. Sure but there is no victim for that law, its purpose is xenophobic defense of an imaginary line.
The entire thought process to justify that enforcement action only works if you exist inside a statist frame.
This but across all border, state, and city lines. Hello sir, we need to search your vehicle to make sure you’re not bringing in illegals.
First they suspended rights along the border, then they started expanding the distance considered on the border.
Now I think it is 95% of Americans have multiple legal rights suspended in the name of border enforcement and they don't even realize it. They think border means "can see the Rio Grande" not within 250 miles of any land border or coastline.
I very much agree with the last part of your note. But since we can't magically make the state disappear, one of the only valid uses of state monopoly on violence is to secure your boarders so that they cannot be overrun and your society ruined by the locusts devouring everything.
But you give more power to the state in the process. Now you need to present your paper when traveling to make sure you’re not illegal.
Sure. And I detest that. There are really, really easy things to do with immigration policy to make all this moot. They haven't been done because they don't suit the purposes of destroying "the West."
Idk if the goal is to destroy the west. Seems to specific and arbitrary. Why destroy the west? For pure evil purposes? I think it’s more about political power. Makes more sense to me.
Or stop paying them to come here and stop using WEF loans to keep their native country poor.
Beating on a people because they moved because you ruined their home is not a legitimate use of violence.
