> what are you asking the devs to encrypt here that they haven't already? In other words, what's the problem?
I recommend the devs (1) implement payment channels so the sender can create his payment data on a second layer instead of the base layer (2) implement onion routing between payment channels so that even the sender's channel counterparties aren't in a position to know if he's the sender or not (3) within those channels, actually encrypt all communication between counterparties so that ISPs can't read it (4) do not publish payment data on a blockchain, not even the encrypted blobs transmitted between channels
Or, you can just use lightning, because it already has all of those features
So you don't actually have any point here
You can just use Monero over Tor, why would you use lightning?
Smart people don't want a "layer 2" that doesn't use a decentralized p2p blockchain like the original
Even when you use monero over tor, the sender still has to publish his transaction info on the blockchain, including (1) the sender's pubkey (2) the recipient's pubkey. That is bad for the privacy of both parties. So don't do that. Lightning fixes this.
> Smart people don't want a "layer 2"
Smart people don't want to publish all of their transactions for everyone to see (and analyze)
Oh so you're one of those people that thinks it's better to only have lightning invoices and never use wallet addresses? 🤣
How would the actual layer 1 work then? Or is it just different there?
Thread collapsed
Don't waste your time on this monero bot.
People shouldn't waste their time on gangstalkers like you
Do you actually tell yourself I'm a bot to feel better about yourself or is that just an insult you like to use online?
Its because you behave like a bot, which means it doesn't matter if you actually are or not.
I behave like a cyborg, not a bot
You behave like a neutered scrotum
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed