No worries. I totally made a few notes back to back as I kept digging deeper. And I agree that AI is not to be taken for face value but for someone like me whose not in the thick of the tech side of Bitcoin it helps to translate and clarify things well enough. Then next comes in bringing in the community and hearing from real people who have strong takes on it where I again may need AI to help me decipher what they are saying simply because I lack deep historical knowledge or the inner workings of the tech consensus policy stuff like that. :)
I apologize, I must take a step back myself 😅
I got lost in a thread of your studybitcoin posts that were quote-posting prior study material. So that led me to make one comment generally on the AI text (not specific to the post wrt to analyzing P's original post). For clarity, this method of learning is great, but some of the info is missing context or full information. I understand getting the general gist is normally sufficient, but with bitcoin there are so many nuances that are normally missed (evidenced by Grok, for example, having convos with tenured & technical individuals on X needing to be corrected on certain aspects it responded confidently on)
src: https://x.com/evoskuil/status/1962793264433566006
Feel free to ignore me, as I'm a complete stranger to you. But I appreciate the discourse!
Discussion
No replies yet.