Exactly, and it is not incumbent upon any current user to explain why a change may be a bad idea. The default position is no change. Instead, the burden of proof rests on anyone who wants to see a change to give a sufficiently convincing argument FOR their proposed change and build demand for it. But when the proposal has been around for years and arguments have been presented and there is still not enough demand or consensus to implement it, then it may very well be that it is not a necessary change, at least at this time.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.