Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ

sorry to disrupt the joy there i just did literally implement a nip05 feature in my fork of leproxy (which automates getting certs, i recently added the ability to add your own paid certs) and i understood how it worked at the abstract level for the domain, and how all of those name@ parts refer to a different user but they don't refer to a different name or address so the web server would need some other scheme to specify

perhaps it can be simply done with an automatic http-basic path resolution rather than a subpath as i am suggesting, maybe this is just "implementation details" but i think it's important to establish a standard practise

Avatar
Lez 1y ago

I'm not sure if I understand correctly, but I suspect some misunderstanding here.

To be clear: the lez@nostr.hu here is the NIP-05 address itself. Not a HTTP authentication. It directs clients to relays + a npub.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

what does the USERNAME translate into

let's say i am implementing said git-http service, how do i specify which path it looks for when it's lez vs DanConwayDev ?

Thread collapsed