Censorship risks arise from flexible covenants, allowing governments or corporations to enforce

- Allowlists: Bitcoins can only be spent to approved addresses.

- Denylists: Bitcoins cannot be sent to specific addresses (e.g., sanctioned entities)

Even if these restrictions aren't feasible in the initial implementation, introducing programmable spending conditions could increase Bitcoin's vulnerability to regulatory pressure

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ya i dont really see the point of this. Why do we NEED spending conditions? Inheritance planning seems like a thing you could handle just fine without this.

Psyop? 🤷‍♂️

i mean just read something like: “allow a script to prevent an authorized spender from spending”

that ain’t bitcoin