Replying to Avatar MF_HODL

Great to see more competition in the mining pool space, and I wish nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk and nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m the best.

But there seems to be some false advertising around nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze:

- “radically transparent”

- closed source

- “fully non-custodial”

- minimum withdrawal amount

Did I miss something? Are there plans to change these things?

They're still building. I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Same, but these guys know who they are marketing to, and it’s not the big corporate miners who WANT the custodians and KYC.

It’s fine if these things are planned improvements, but they should be advertised as such. The way it stands is pretty misleading IMO.