Replying to Avatar ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ

and you think it's ok removing configuration controls for a spam related element of the core configuration?

you handed luke a win on this, idk what you guys think you are doing
Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 7mo ago 💬 2

there is two ways that controversy surrounds a person:

1. they are a drama queen

2. they really are being attacked and most of the devs are either in on it or going along with it

since it has involved his computer being hacked i question the likelihood of it being 1.

i'm also a black sheep in my dev community as well and i'm basically shadowbanned from visibility even though i have had many valid points of criticism of the establishment, so i'm inclined to believe that the core devs are a bunch of sheep who are letting the wolves run wild on the backs of the users

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 7mo ago 💬 1

and i'm not gonna be gaslit about this, the history of covert attempts to subvert the security of bitcoin is extensive and if you don't think that matters you are a naive midwit

Avatar
Lostdog 7mo ago 💬 1

Would it not be more useful to start reviewing and contributing to knots then, instead of posting empty rhetoric to socials?

Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 7mo ago 💬 1

it's hilarious a crowd of people who are constantly in controversy pointing at one of them like he hasn't got a valid point, especially with people like Peter Tod on your team.

i do know how to write blockchain servers and this problem is obvious to anyone who can write even a little one method microservice

guess what, the users decided they don't like what your team did, so go suck it, instead of concern trolling

you were wrong, fuck off

Avatar
Lostdog 7mo ago

Again, would it not be more useful to start reviewing and contributing to knots then, instead of yelling at strangers on the internet?