Sydney’s Taronga Zoo claims their plot “always was, always will be, aboriginal land”.

This is the entry to the zoo where animals from around Australia and the world have been bought.

Kind of ironic when the Aborigines on this land were living in the stoneage when colonised. They didn’t have flags. They didn’t have trade. They didn’t have nations. They didn’t have writing. They didn’t have agriculture. They didn’t even have settlements and certainly didn’t have captive animals.

I’d willingly give up Australia to the Aborigines on the condition they take it at the technology level they had on colonisation.

No housing. No electricity. No roads. No healthcare. No schools. No cities. No shops. No money. They can have it back in the condition it was found if they like, let’s put it to a vote and see how many want that.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This post is so wrong, on so many levels. Disappointing

Brow beating doesn’t work on me.

If you have an argument then make it.

Simplistic take. There was a huge number of Aboriginal nations.

Aborigines used alternative technologies. For instance, instead of writing and cartography, they used song:

A knowledgeable person is able to navigate across the land by repeating the words of the song, which describe the location of landmarks, waterholes, and other natural phenomena. In some cases, the paths of the creator-beings are said to be evident from their marks, or petrosomatoglyphs, on the land, such as large depressions in the land which are said to be their footprints.

By singing the songs in the appropriate sequence, Aboriginal people could navigate vast distances, often travelling through the deserts of Australia's interior. The continent of Australia contains an extensive system of songlines, some of which are of a few kilometres, whilst others traverse hundreds of kilometres through lands of many different Aboriginal peoples — peoples who may speak markedly different languages and have different cultural traditions. One songline marks a 3,500-kilometre (2,200 mi) route connecting the Central Desert Region with the east coast, to the place now called Byron Bay. Desert peoples travelled to the ocean to observe fishing practices, and coastal people travelled inland to sacred sites such as Uluru and Kata Tjuta.

Since a songline can span the lands of several different language groups, different parts of the song are said to be in those different languages. Languages are not a barrier because the melodic contour of the song describes the nature of the land over which the song passes. The rhythm is what is crucial to understanding the song. Listening to the song of the land is the same as walking on this songline and observing the land. Songlines have been described as a "cultural passport" which, when sung in the language of a particular region and mob, show respect to the people of that country.

i love your perspective but ultimately, who gives a fuck. even if there is validity to either side, it's a proxy debate on behalf of our ancestors. Not one single factor in this whole issue was influenced by anyone who is still alive