believe me that the philosophy that women use is simply a justification of their behavior as a result of trauma. And the dogma that every woman supports has nothing to do with her behavior. she will use the dogma to appear at a higher intellectual level, but in essence it is a mechanism of displacement, an animal instinct for competition, a sexual instinct and a severe trauma.
Discussion
Sometimes. Statistics say that most women who are promiscuous have been raped, molested or sexually assaulted. In my personal experience, I've found it to be true. The irony here is that women who treat themselves like a piece of meat are doing so because they believe it's true. They justify their thoughts by telling themselves things like we're all animals with sexual desires. Yeah sure, that's true to an extent. Women will envision themselves as predators on the prowl. But what they hunt isn't really anything with a high value. Although, some do it for money. I suppose that it could be valuable to an extent.
These behaviors make the rest of us look bad, however. Men start to assume all women are the same, and up for grabs and they just want it from anyone and everyone.
I'm not sure how you're trying to use dogma.
Do you mean women's religious or political beliefs? Or are you using it more loosely? Like them supporting a societal norm?
Regardless, belief systems have much to do with people's behavior. And yeah some people do think that if they agree with some sort of authority figure it makes them appear intellectual.
"My religious and/or political views make me far superior and knowledgeable"
But it really just means they're sheep.
If society tells you to act a certain way, dress a certain way, and look a certain way.. and you comply... it just means you're a well trained animal.
The notion that you have to look like anything should be ridiculous. Much like linking intelligence to outward appearances.
In most cases it is a behavioral issue.
If your beautiful, you may not be forced to think for yourself. However, if you're ugly, there's a higher probability that you will be forced to improve your brain functioning.
This doesn't mean that there's going to always be a direct connection. Some people don't look good and have a learning disability... some people get a lot of things handed to them and done for them, but decide to do things for themselves.
The world isn't so black and white, kid.
I mean, if they identify themselves as feminists, but this is accompanied by behavior that some call immoral (onlyfans, porn, etc.), they are justifying their behavior but not facing the real problem.
I don't believe that there are feminist women today, but people who are part of different habitats because they feel good and are supported within them. idealism is a rare characteristic. doing things that you think are right to do is a divine, not human trait.
Explain your logic... please.
here's an example. it is a girl. let's call her May. May is a minor girl who faced sexual assault at a young age. And based on Freud's psychoanalysis, every psychosis is rooted in childhood sexual abuse.
May's protective displacement mechanism is directing her toward "trouble" and inappropriate behavior to forget her childhood trauma. as she is unable and ready to face her trauma.
May does not know what is happening to him, the protective mechanisms prevent him from seeing reality. she is not ready to accept reality and the survival instinct is stronger than her traumas.
suppose that even this behavior would not be able to give peace because it would simply increase her traumas, so she develops what psychology calls the protective mechanism of isolation or intellectualism. she justifies her behavior in an intellectual way, like the right to her body blah blah blah..
May continues to have emotional illiteracy and instead of facing her problem of seeing reality with pragmatic eyes, a habitat called "feminism" joins, which supports May.
so she supports this ideology within this habitat to justify her actions but not that she doesn't feel less animal and her competitive instincts have died.
so this kind of dogma that she supports makes her feel comfortable.
so I personally do not believe that May is a feminist, but I believe that she is fighting to be accepted by others as she is. I'm repeating it.
to be aware and again to do something because you have empathy and think it is right to do it, without including the ego is something very rare. the essence of feminism is to protect women. Also, the essence of psychiatric institutions is to cure patients with mental problems, but drugs and therapy do not work, they simply make people addicted to drugs and legal poison. Even feminism, even though it basically has the protection of women, the moment it becomes popular, large masses of problematic people join it, it starts to go out of its framework, it loses its purpose and does not heal your wound.
it is the same as with all dogmas, which may in essence seem perfect and beautiful, but when practiced by people they turn into chaos.
I don't believe Freud ever said that all psychosis is rooted in sexual abuse during childhood... or anything close to that.
A displacement mechanism is like projection. Essentially, when you direct your emotions towards a surrogate. Like how you got so extra aggressive towards me. Is it really me, or something else?
I think you're thinking of disassociation. To disconnect from reality.
Which actually makes me think of another book I thought about suggesting. I read it as a kid. It's called you don't know me by Klass. It's about a boy with an abusive father who develops a dissociative disorder and lives in his head. He plays the tuba in school and pretends its a frog. His defense was his overactive imagination. One day he has a breakdown in band class and cries that the frog (his tuba) died. It's fascinating from a psychological standpoint. And relatable to anyone who went through trauma. I haven't read it in like 20 years (i read it whenit was new)... but I still recommend it. I cried.
Anyway....
I'm glad you're using your brain though.
Everything else is pretty good. That is to say, you're not completely wrong.
Also...
Usually people just call it hijacking... when problematic people join an ideology, cause, religion, or whatever.... so on and so forth.
Your provocation about Freud is unnecessary. anyway, I have some bikini photos when I post them, I will accompany them with philosophical expressions so that people will not remain ignorant.
Well, you're going to have to study more... clearly. But like I said, try reading a book because Google isn't working for you.
And if you really NEED attention that badly, why not go balls deep and have a descriptive tag line that describes why you feel you need it.
I never search on Google to answer someone.