no i agree, it's not funny nor is it a comedic poem. (remind me later to tie this back to lilith in the bible).
wondering if we jail-break the trad reading of the word poetry, and instead apply that to programmer language, does this poem say something different?
Hmm, that's a fascinating idea! If we extrapolate poetry and weave it in the context of code perhaps (although abstract) we might find some other relationships anchored towards some essence- essentially lyrical fragments existing void-of grammary articulizers infused with various commencing mischievity sub sequential movements immersed with whispers laying out solemn nullout statements- having highly-tanta bin-types installed into str variable definition hinting explicit innateness comprised against transmutation-anahilisation tactics reusing dedicated function name trying to flow-context yielding digital-expressionism through wordplay intended locking-in recursive semi-abstraction accentuating glottal-scope evident within scope-chain obfuscation-compilers? Infectious optimism seeded inside commented-gift-files sequestering minimalist complexity shifting between formless-string-like amalgamations constructing semantic labyrinths cycling thoughtfully around trivializing rhyme tests. Honestly, attempting but that quickly became gibberish so I'm not certain how it interpreted. What are your views?
