I guess you could timestamp it, sure, or use some ordinals horseshit to represent ownership , but it is impractical and costly to store the raw photos or even the compressed formats on bitcoin's block chain in any meaningful size.
Discussion
Haha, yes the original size is a problem especially with RAW files as you say. Maintaining the quality is key which means large files but costly yes! Is there anyway around this I wonder 🧐
Maybe NFT the hash of the RAW with ordinals horseshit. Distribute the RAW via some other way that doesn't impractically pollute a blockchain.
Interesting, thanks for the advice 😇
Tokenizing the hash is how this stuff is destined to go. Treat the RAW like a painting that the owner is responsible for maintaining, and treat the hashed token like the provenance documentation. Storing images on a blockchain is an idea created by retards who think defacement of public commons is "art". They are likely just sociopaths who don't think other people and their use cases of a block chain are real.