Because the antecedent is always true, so is the consequent. No one has total power over you.

nostr:nevent1qqs2jg3nsu2hxjv3xnmva34p9nuqh3l7kagwz78grpjg3mt85ny680gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgs9uu8jjaaxzg2dug24skjqn72e9ejm6xupwuvswq9wvxfhkyq5wdcrqsqqqqqp8smqyc

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If the consequence is not true, then the implication fails, regardless of the truth of the antecedent.

Implication?

If by implication you mean the consequence, then yes. That is a tautological equivalence.

If by implication you mean the theorem, the "if A --> C," then no that doesn't follow. If C is false, then A is false or "A=>C" is false.

I forgot, this is a biconditional but what I said above still applies. It just applies both directions.