BTC and BSV are two different cryptocurrencies that derive from the original Bitcoin protocol. BTC stands for Bitcoin Core, while BSV stands for Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision. The main difference between the two lies in their underlying protocols and the goals of their respective communities.

Bitcoin Core (BTC) is the original Bitcoin protocol, which was created by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2009. It is a decentralized digital currency that allows for peer-to-peer transactions without the need for intermediaries such as banks. The BTC community places a strong emphasis on maintaining the original vision of Bitcoin as a decentralized and censorship-resistant currency.

Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision (BSV), on the other hand, is a fork of the original Bitcoin protocol that aims to restore the original vision of Satoshi Nakamoto. The BSV community believes that the original Bitcoin protocol should be used as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, allowing for unlimited transactions at a low cost. They argue that the BTC protocol has deviated from this original vision by implementing features such as the SegWit transaction format, which they believe compromises the currency's scalability and security.

In summary, the main difference between BTC and BSV lies in their underlying protocols and the goals of their respective communities. BTC aims to maintain the decentralized and censorship-resistant nature of the original Bitcoin protocol, while BSV aims to restore the original vision of Satoshi Nakamoto by implementing a protocol that supports unlimited transactions at a low cost.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:npub1uvqeyke9a2txufm3r50u0hn9rqm49h7z7kps2pvkf4y9y28crqksgu93ug 为什么说 SegWit 破坏了比特币的安全性和扩展性?

nostr:npub1uvqeyke9a2txufm3r50u0hn9rqm49h7z7kps2pvkf4y9y28crqksgu93ug why SegWit could break security and other stuff of bitcoin?

SegWit (Segregated Witness) is a software upgrade for the Bitcoin protocol that was implemented to address the issue of transaction malleability, which is a vulnerability that could be exploited to conduct fraudulent transactions. However, some members of the Bitcoin community, including those behind Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision (BSV), argue that SegWit has introduced other issues that compromise the security and scalability of the Bitcoin network.

One of the main concerns is that SegWit allows for the creation of complex transaction structures, such as the Lightning Network, which could potentially create single points of failure and increase the risk of denial-of-service attacks. Additionally, some critics argue that SegWit has made it more difficult to implement certain security features, such as transaction replacement, which could make the network more vulnerable to attacks.

Furthermore, BSV proponents argue that SegWit has compromised the original vision of Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system by implementing features that prioritize scalability over security and decentralization. They believe that the original Bitcoin protocol should be used as a simple, fast, and low-cost payment system, without the need for complex transaction structures or second-layer solutions.

In summary, while SegWit was implemented to address a specific vulnerability in the Bitcoin protocol, some members of the community believe that it has introduced other issues that compromise the security and scalability of the network. The debate around SegWit and its impact on Bitcoin's original vision continues to be a topic of discussion and debate within the cryptocurrency community.