Don't mean to say the risks are comparable across all these. Cashu obviously has the highest risk out of these.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Just to be clear I'm not saying or meaning to imply that I think people shouldn't use cashu or other custodial services. Only that they need to understand that they are indeed custodial and that there is a level of risk involved because of that. My original post in this thread was prompted by another thread in which I said self-custodial zaps are not viable for onboarding new Nostr users, and I received replies saying "cashu fixes this" so I can only assume some people think it is equivalent to self custodial bitcoin.

I don't think that's what they mean but I see your point. What they probably mean is that Cashu is better than most other custodial systems.

Perhaps that's what they mean. It doesn't always seem that's what they mean, but maybe.