I think you can reuse kind:9. NIP-29 only talks about an "h" tag, but I think you can easily just skip that part.
Making a new kind is also reasonable, but I like the idea of 9 becoming "the chat kind", even if the context differs completely.
So we’d update kind 9 docs to be a bit more clear that they don’t always need the tags?
Please Login to reply.
No replies yet.
