They picked the conclusion and then jumped through all kinds of hoops trying to make it stick. Like a lot of fiat science.
If you are sick enough to spread an illness because of a virus, then these samples should be teaming with viruses. But they have to scroll around all day looking for them? And also, what you are even claiming is not true. They can’t find any “viruses” until they “culture” them or do some other elaborate process. It’s pseudoscience. Here’s a study where they claim they found viruses in oral samples but then you read the damn thing and see they have some elaborate process and introduce loads of chemicals and things before they finally “find” the viruses: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10099536/
Discussion
No replies yet.