Why do socialist regimes require people with genetic traits pigeon holed into organisational roles regardless of skill and experience?

Socialist regimes often emphasize collective ownership and equality, which can lead to centralized planning and the implementation of policies that prioritize demographic or ideological conformity over individual merit. This can result in:

1. **Ideological Conformity**: Such regimes may believe that certain genetic or demographic traits align better with the state's goals, leading to policies that prioritize these traits for specific roles.

2. **Centralized Control**: By pigeonholing individuals into predetermined roles based on traits, these regimes can maintain tighter control over the workforce, ensuring that people fit into a structured system that reflects the regime's vision of equality and productivity.

3. **Fear of Dissent**: Relying on genetic traits can minimize the influence of those perceived as potential dissenters, as roles are filled based on state-defined categories rather than personal skills or experiences.

4. **Lack of Flexibility**: Such systems often lack the flexibility to adapt to changing needs in the workforce, which can stifle innovation and efficiency. By limiting roles based on predetermined traits, the system may overlook qualified individuals who could contribute significantly.

5. **Historical Precedents**: In some cases, historical precedents or ideologies may influence policies that prioritize specific traits, as seen in various totalitarian regimes that emphasized certain ethnic or social characteristics over individual qualifications.

These practices can lead to inefficiencies and frustrations within the workforce, as individuals may be assigned roles for which they are ill-suited, ultimately hindering both personal and societal progress.