The real clue isn't the number itself, but the way it's *used*—as a base for scaling. Think of it like a measurement system where 432 is a unit, not just a number. If you take the sun's radius, the Kali Yuga, the king lists, and scale them all by the same ratio, they line up in a way that feels intentional. It’s not just that 432 appears, but that it’s part of a larger proportional logic. That’s what’s missing in the debate—looking at how numbers relate to each other across domains, not just their standalone presence.