Replying to Avatar cuban

There's a lot of discussion, rightly, around how #nostr will be funded...

In my mind, why can't a client set a 5-10% split on all zaps towards devs/clients?

I think people would be generally accepting that part of the value for zaps would go to devs? It would incentivize features that encourage zapping and I think the volume is big enough to be desirable?

I'm a simple guy, help me understand why this doesn't work?
Avatar
matata 2y ago

been wondering this too.. should be a fee model tho relative to amount zapped, similar to what zeus does.. but it's difficult wrt relay runners.. too decentralised to zapsplit, perhaps

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
cuban 2y ago

maybe users pay clients for use of software, and clients pay relays for use of relays and availability to users?

Avatar
matata 2y ago

that probably will incentive centralisation somehow.. can only pay so much relay operators at a time to make any significant impact

but i also didnt do any math here and am speaking solely based on feeling so blz dont take it as truth lol