You can just own what you active occupy and use. There's no reason to put some fences, a real estate's plate and tell "this piece of land is mine!". Regarding hostels or inns you're just attacking strawmen because they can't be squatted because there are constant people working inside it.

Further reading to more clarification:

[In Defense — Such As It Is — of Usufructory Land Ownership](https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2012/04/in-defense-such-as-it-is-of-usufructory-land-ownership/)

[Are Hotels Immoral?](https://www.libertarian-labyrinth.org/contrun/are-hotels-immoral/)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So if you aren't on your land 24/7/365, someone can come in and claim it by right of occupancy. Right. Totally logical.

Yes, I'm being absurdist, but that's the logical conclusion of that kind of thinking.

If I own land morally, I may make mututally voluntary contracts for the use of the land, as it is my right to do so. This can include renumeration for resources, time spent with my permission on the land, or really anything else agreed on in the contract.

fuckin agorists. they are red, as far as i'm concerned, when it comes to this subject.

they can try and occupy the edges of my ranch, and i will put bullets in their asses.

From individualist anarchist Benjamin Tucker:

"It should be stated, however, that in the case of land, or of any other material the supply of which is so limited that all cannot hold it in unlimited quantities, Anarchism undertakes to protect no titles except such as are based on **actual occupancy and use.**"

— Benjamin Tucker, *Instead of a Book*, p. 61

"the land monopoly. . . consists in the enforcement by government of land titles which do not rest upon **personal occupancy and cultivation**. . .the individual should no longer be protected by their fellows in anything but **personal occupation and cultivation of land**."

— Benjamin Tucker, *The Anarchist Reader*, p. 150

"Ground rent exists only because the State stands by to collect it and to protect land titles rooted in force or fraud. Otherwise land would be free to all, and no one could control **more than he used**."

— Benjamin Tucker, quoted by James J. Martin, *Men Against the State*, p. 210

Tucker’s explanation of "property" as denoting possession:

"property" ... "as denoting the labourer's individual **possession of his product** or his share of the joint product of himself and others."

— Benjamin Tucker, *Instead of a Book*, p. 394

The important word is "AND"

occupation AND cultivation

Yupppp.

if i build fences, and you cross them, you agreed to be shot at. the end.

You really believe this shit?