China's Strategic Interests in the Panama Canal and Greenland: Implications for U.S. Policy
https://m.primal.net/PDnN.webp
China's growing presence in both Panama and Greenland reflects its broader strategic ambitions. These regions hold significant geopolitical and economic importance, and China’s increased influence raises concerns for U.S. national security and global trade stability.
China's Expanding Role in Panama and the Canal
Since establishing diplomatic relations with Panama in 2017, China has significantly expanded its investments in the country. Panama joined China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), leading to increased Chinese involvement in key infrastructure projects, including a $1.4 billion contract for constructing the canal's fourth bridge. Additionally, Chinese companies have managed ports at both ends of the canal for years, raising concerns about potential control over global shipping routes.
Beyond economic investments, China has extended its influence into Panama’s political landscape. Reports indicate that Chinese-backed entities have gained positions in advisory and governmental roles, shaping policies that align with Beijing’s long-term strategic interests. This growing influence has prompted concerns among U.S. policymakers about the future of American access and security in the region.
A key aspect of China’s engagement in Panama is debt-trap diplomacy, a strategy designed to create economic dependency. By offering large infrastructure loans with terms that favor Chinese interests, Beijing can exert pressure on nations unable to meet their debt obligations. This approach effectively places recipient countries in a position of financial and political subjugation, forcing them to comply with China’s strategic objectives.
However, following diplomatic engagement with the United States, Panama announced in February 2025 that it would not renew its participation in the BRI. This decision, influenced by concerns over sovereignty and geopolitical balance, signals a shift away from deepening reliance on China. Nevertheless, it remains imperative that Panama fully honors its treaty obligations with the U.S. regarding the canal’s neutrality and accessibility. If Panama fails to uphold these agreements, the U.S. must consider taking more assertive actions, including regaining control of the canal to ensure its continued function as an open and secure trade route.
China’s Expanding Interests in Greenland
Greenland, with its vast natural resources and strategic location, has become a focal point for Chinese investment. China has shown particular interest in Greenland’s rare earth minerals, which are essential for advanced technology and defense industries. Chinese firms have aggressively pursued mining operations, aiming to establish long-term access to these critical resources.
Beyond economic ventures, China has expressed interest in developing key infrastructure projects in Greenland, including airports and ports. Such projects have raised concerns among Western allies about China’s potential to establish a strategic foothold in the Arctic region. This has prompted increased vigilance from the United States and Denmark, as controlling key infrastructure in Greenland could provide China with leverage over Arctic trade routes and military logistics.
China’s interest in Greenland also follows the pattern of debt-trap diplomacy, similar to its strategy in other regions. By investing heavily in infrastructure and resource extraction projects, China seeks to establish financial leverage over Greenland, which could lead to undue influence over its governance and policies. The current governing authority lacks the means to adequately defend against such economic coercion, making it imperative for the U.S. to step in and secure Greenland’s resources and strategic positioning for the benefit of Western security and economic stability.
Strategic Considerations and Necessary Actions for the United States
The Panama Canal and Greenland are critical to U.S. economic and military interests. Ensuring stability and accessibility in these regions is essential for maintaining global trade security and defense readiness.
Regaining Influence Over the Panama Canal is vital for U.S. economic and military logistics. The U.S. should insist that Panama upholds its treaty obligations, and if necessary, explore options to reassert control over the canal to prevent foreign dominance.
Protecting Greenland’s Resources is crucial to preventing over-reliance on China for essential minerals that power American technology and defense industries.
Securing Greenland as a U.S. Territory would ensure long-term protection of its strategic assets and prevent adversaries from gaining a foothold in the Arctic.
Safeguarding Strategic Arctic Interests ensures that the United States retains operational capabilities in a region of growing geopolitical competition.
Policy Recommendations for U.S. Leadership
China’s increasing presence in these regions underscores the need for a proactive and strategic U.S. response. Key recommendations include:
Strengthening Diplomatic Ties with Panama and Greenland to ensure their continued alignment with Western economic and security interests.
Enhancing Economic and Infrastructure Investments to provide viable alternatives to Chinese-backed projects, reducing Beijing’s leverage in these critical regions.
Expanding Security and Intelligence Cooperation to monitor and counteract efforts that may undermine U.S. influence and strategic mobility.
Exploring Territorial Integration of Greenland to solidify U.S. security in the Arctic and eliminate vulnerabilities to foreign influence.
Conclusion
China’s growing role in the Panama Canal and Greenland presents both economic opportunities and strategic challenges. While investments in these regions contribute to infrastructure development, they also introduce potential risks for U.S. interests. A balanced approach—one that fosters collaboration with local governments while safeguarding American economic and security priorities—will be essential in navigating this evolving geopolitical landscape. The U.S. must take decisive steps to secure its influence in these regions and ensure long-term stability and control over vital global trade and military assets.