๐ฎโฌ๏ธ tarot:
the reality of defining yourself as another is always risky, or trying to become someone else if your real identity in order to profit on them. the complete distortion surrounding the exercises in acting having been corrupted into everyone being an actor is kinda disturbing.... the world is not a stage in that regard - i think whoever interpreted shakespeare as meaning we are all supposed to act missed the fucking historical context; political commentary and criticism disguised as entertainment outside of its context is dangerously misappropriated. "all the worlds a stage and we are mere players" was a dig at the political climate making everyone puppets of the agenda of the queen... elizabeth was sort of an autocrat... a patron of the arts but also a deft politico. shakespeare was a dissenter against the politics of the age, whatever you may think about the plays. the reality of what francis bacon was is probably something worth looking at again... i have always maintained my literary theory as shakespeare was a pen name and a man built into a character (not unlike kirk) used to promote the agendas of powerful men. the contrast of christopher marlowe who, raw, did it all himself i cuddling his writing - a sherlock holmes spy figure in the aristocracy - shows the offense in the "gentleman and the reiver". i am more of a marlowe gal, myself. dr faustus was about shakespeare - the sellout hack, and when you look at the call and response of shakespeare (bacon) and marlowe in their publications, you realize marlowe was documenting was a scumbag propagandist shakespeare the character was.... not just about the plays but the man who fronted for a bunch of powerful men. the ultimate theban play about masculine distortion .... the powerful group of shadow politico men running a patsy. i have always found it fascinating how difficult it is to find academic classes on marlowe but the absolute ease of finding them on shakespeare. convenient for secret society shadow culture, huh? it is an appropriate apology for right now - the clown hack being exposed by the marlowe or the sherlock holmes. the interesting thing about a holmes is he is a traitor to the aristocratic norms but profoundly necessary as well because of the cutthroat times. the 1590s and the 1890s are similar in their housecleaning auras. only a mafia group would challenge a wife of a "martyr" for the larger cult agenda for control of her inheritance - not matter how corrupt she is etc. there is a gang war of actors in the shakespeare troupe unfolding in real time... i suggest you stay out of it. marlowe was a real deep state; shakespeare was a front man for deep state shadow cults propagandizing their agendas in the arts.... and elizabeth funded them all to occupy them. marlowe wrote dissent and had knife fights in alleys; arguably fakes his death and kept writing in the newspapers. i suggest everyone have a sobering sense of what we are seeing. it is not a game and despite the point of sale you do not get to reboot yourself after you "die". (i am a literature scholar, not anti shakespeare but instead a deeper thinker of the historical context of the content, and this is my morning reflection analogy for explaining today's tarot - and my perspective; i don't care if you disagree with me.).
โดฒ.
