Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar MAHDOOD

I don’t have any interest in making any sort of contract with the state. A marriage contract requires the state to be the enforcer. Unless you’re talking about an unwritten contract between a man and his partner. That’s fine but not marriage in the traditional sense.

You’re right that it is not guaranteed to fail but the odds are a coin toss that your marriage will fail. And that doesn’t account for the number of marriages that are miserable but stay together for the kids or because divorce is expensive. I know a decent amount of people that have been separated for many years but still legally married. Even more that are trapped in a loveless marriage where cheating is likely happening or inevitably going to happen.

Avatar
Kevin's Bacon 7mo ago

I guess I'm living in anarchy in my head. I'm talking about a voluntary contract of marriage with reasonable terms. That's a good point that usually people mean a state instrument. Gross. Yeah I don't know about that one. I rely on private contracts as much as I can for everything. But that's an issue with statism and everything that accompanies statism, much moreso than an issue with the concept of a legally binding marriage.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.