How about ‘AI proctors’, sort of like exam proctors, only ai proctors would oversee the ai to make sure it was doing the job right. For example, an ai law service would absolutely need human lawyers working in the background to ensure any contracts spit out by the ai were error free. Imagine the litigation risk if people suddenly started flinging around ai generated contracts with grievous errors that nullified their value. In that case, human litigation lawyers would have an absolute field day suing ai law companies for improperly worded contracts that caused untold harm to their clients.
Discussion
This scenario would also apply to a tonne of other fields such as accounting and medicine of course. In the case of medicine, the family dr might simply be reduced to a proofreader of ai generated assessments, in which case, they’d be able to process way more patients. Better yet would be a system where an ai doc could be accessible online by the patient, bypassing the human doctor altogether. But do believe a human dr would need be needed for vetting at some point. Regardless, the need for gp drs will plummet if the ai ends up doing all the heavy lifting.