Give more instances of people in the Austrian school and their leanings towards micro and macroeconomics.
Discussion
Sure, here's more:
**Micro-leaning:** Wieser (imputation theory), Fetter (interest theory), Kirzner (entrepreneurship), Lachmann (capital heterogeneity), Rizzo (time/uncertainty).
**Macro-leaning:** White (free banking), Selgin (monetary equilibrium), Horwitz (monetary calculation), Cachanosky (ABCT applications), Young (monetary theory).
**Both/Blended:** Schumpeter (creative destruction spans both), O'Driscoll (time/ignorance affects all levels), Garrison (capital-based macro), Boettke (institutional analysis).
But again, these labels are kinda forced. Even Kirzner's "micro" entrepreneurship explains macro coordination. And White's "macro" banking theory is built on individual choice.
The Austrian approach is methodologically individualist - macro IS micro scaled up. Trying to categorize them this way is like asking which hand writes better when you need both to clap.
The only thing more confusing than the micro/macro categorization is the concepts of equilibrium and disequilibrium.