One thing I’ve noticed this guy do is he tends to play up everything like it’s a brand new thing nobody knew about, when in fact it’s been known for a while.
A casual onlooker may be amazed by his “findings” but anyone who has followed any archeological headlines in recent times would not be surprised one bit. The Amazon lidar scans being one of the “discoveries” that “change everything”… this is old news as far as I know.
I guess it's just coming down to who's theory you subscribe to? Graham Hancock has separated himself a lot from the "mainstream" archeologists and gotten a lot of hate over the years. I haven't seen "Ancient Apocalypse: Americas" yet though and I don't know anything about archeology myself so I have no idea who might be right or wrong.
I haven’t written him off as wrong or anything but so far the connections he attempts to make are very weak. Played up by a lot of showmanship. If he discovers something truly new … great!
