It's an ugly brand people willingly get to distinguish themselves from one another, ironically plopping them forever in the same pit as everybody else who ruined their body with ink for no reason. They always look like shit. People 200 years ago would spit on you for getting one and they'd be right to do so.
Discussion
200 years ago people got tattoos against their will or it was considered a ritual of rite. Now peoples decisions on what they get as a tattoo sure I could agree if you get a branded logo your a slave. But getting a tattoo period nah people can decorate their body however they want it's not a slave to do it.
Example I met a suicidal dude once who changed his life around he tried to kill himself by cutting his wrist after he got help & changed himself around he got tattooed over the spot he cut himself made it look like skin cracks into space nebulas. Looked cool I understood he was doing it to cover his scars & for himself. It wasn't a brand so I think it was pretty good.
On the other hand i've seen many people with stupid tattoos. I met a chick once who was skinny then got super fat she had mcdonalds 4pc chicken nuggets tattooed on her witj the mcdonalds box too. They don't make that box anymore, I seen a dude with a ham & cheese sandwich on his chest, & the most common which I hate. A rose with thorns or a dove most say it was for my grandma who I love very mich that died she liked roses ot doves the thorns are for pain because it hurts shes gone. If I had a nickel for everytime I heard that i'd be one rich man.