Subnostr

I am confident planes did not hit the buildings, and that the imagery shown to the world of planes hitting buildings was faked. I believe this for very specific reasons from my own personal analysis of the visual evidence that was later confirmed by others’ work.

The controlled demolition seems obvious to the eye but I’m not an engineer so I rely on the analysis of others to believe that.

I believe the towers were mostly hollow, empty propaganda/tourist pieces like the Eiffel Tower, and I base that largely on Occam’s razor reasoning and the evidence marshaled by a guy named Steve De’ak and others at letsrollforums (which is sadly no more)

Jac 2y ago

Your perspective is interesting, and will prompt a trip or two into some rabbit warrens to learn more. I certainly would like to believe that fewer innocent people lost their lives in what amounts to a massive psychological operation to foment fear in the population, and to justify a war that was about natural resources as a public safety campaign.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

mrclownworld 2y ago

Amen brother. It took me awhile to come to these conclusions but the Occam’s razor of it is that it’s cheaper to not actually kill people but still convince everyone you did. (See also Waco)

Check out New Pearl Harbor, September Clues, 911crashtest.org. Pay attention to who built the towers (the Rockefellers) and who allegedly rented floors (a LOT of CIA front companies). Keep an open mind 🤝